only with the ignorant, and speaking of I was not stressing it, but it crashed which, as is typical for a UWP app, means it just disappeared without any message or warning. yeah sorry about the “discourteous” language but after watching many years of disinformation and outright sabotage by people shilling inferior tech form Mossy Scott B (who can’t code to save his life) declaring it dead in 2011 to the darkest day of the creepy lil monkey Sinofsky jumping up and down about HTML5 sprits in at the first (and still utterly useless) BUILD conference, Metro/RT/Store/UWP is now 8 years old versus 12 for WPF is age is totally meaningless, and with a background in Forms , I can say without a doubt that is absolutely no contest as far as ease of layout (If you know what your doing obviously) and SCALING!, UWP and forms have ZERO support for UI Scaling, scaling the whole UI is not what I’m talking about, only WPF can Scale UI on a small high DPI displays without scaling everything, it’s easy (if you know how) as for Pros, you right I should have said something like High end Pros like Autodesk, Wall street and large enterprise that make the kick ass non-trivial solutions, starting pay for WPF Dev is about 100$k US and there is a ton of demand around the globe, is the true for say a WP or RT/Metro Dev that listened to Ms Barnes in 2011, not so much, it’s cost people nothing to promote the latest sure to be the future ( after all Scott H 2M$ say it’s da future) but it can make all the difference to the unsuspecting young Dev, so yeah I tak huge offense to people saying WPF is old ,dead , limited, too hard, slow, when they are just making it up or basing it on there own limited experience, UWP is inferior and way you slice it, I also gather than UWP hase a very much stripped down graphics framework. On the other hand a simpler solution to all this is the RDP protocol ;). Managed code in WPF apps is in general slower than native code and requires more memory. That’s may more complex and even then the performance is not near Winforms, VCL, ActiveX. As you can see, UWP is way more efficient on that too. I can say I enjoyed using UWP a great deal more. Optimized for memory usage and performance. After 25 years of using MS products, I’m very wary of any tech that is not yet fully established. A customer who needs such software needs a supplier who is in the position and trustworthy enough to handle million dollar project volumes. This brings chemistry handling to Word documents. Which C# desktop UI should I use? Too many products have been mothballed over the years and the amount of time developers have to spend troubleshooting a technical issues with the entire MS stack seems staggering to me as the years pass. Is the latest one the best? Many .NET Framework versions later, it got improved, and it’s still there. If WPF was all about scaling and multimedia, the Windows 8 modern app platform is about touch support and Store-based deployment. As a component maker, I’d say WPF and UWP are a nightmare and it takes MS afterthoughts/hacks to draw anything with performance. UWP is an evolution of the new application platform introduced in Windows 8 in 2012. You can check out this article for more information.. It is partly legacy and the fact that it is easier to maintain and enhance an existing application than to start again. Avalon was WPF's codename. These were fairly complex applications with charts and reports, restful hardware communication and complex robot like processes. Not helpful. Second, like WPF it is a designer-centric platform and not so good for running up quick business applications. It does kind-of scale if you follow certain rules, but successful scaling in a Windows Forms application is often difficult to achieve, so users may suffer chopped-off controls and text, or just ugly screens. In 2019, WPF is in its 13th year which raises the question if WPF is still a good choice? Paint 3D is amazing but not my thing. More interactive - built animations. UWP applications can be native or managed. And see the first, sympathetic comment at the end which is from Tim Sneath. Build your first Web API with F#, Giraffe and host it on Azure Cloud, MagicOnion���������Unified Realtime/API Engine for��.NET Core and Unity, A Cross-Platform GUI Theme for Desktop��.NET Core Applications, Develop Cross-Platform Desktop GUI Apps on Linux with��.NET Core, Fight the global warming: compile your C# apps ahead of time. The Ballad of Mott the Hoople and Ian Hunter,,, Delphi Blogs of the Month #59 - Blog - Developer Tools - IDERA Community, Desktop Development on Windows and Delphi VCL Library - Blog - Developer Tools - IDERA Community, TalkTalk’s new Sagemcom FAST 5364 Router and WiFi Hub. App with stylish user interface that scales nicely: WPF. The new incarnation (WinUI 3.0) will decouple the UWP UI framework and distribute it as a separate package (rather than a part of Windows 10 and UWP SDKs). The vs-addin for visual studio does this automatically as does Qt's own commandline make process. At the same time I do see the merits of UWP versus traditional Windows application deployment. e) There is enough movement in the C/C++ world toward more modern. .NET MAUI will be available in all of those, and support both the existing MVVM and XAML patterns as well as future capabilities like Model-View-Update (MVU) with C#, or even Blazor. What is your experience? did it work, only on the dabblers wannabes, just take a look at all the high paying WPF jobs all over the world, the try to get a position in “compiler and designing programming languages and math totally independent from the technology.”, UWP Controls and WinUI 3.0., Your email address will not be published. but you never actually answered the question – which one should we use? Qt is a large amount of source, which must be present and preinstalled on any … On the image below, I just opened the apps. While scrolling the listview, UWP is also way better. using the Universal Windows Platform (UWP) going forward, or enhancing WPF applications with new features. Just yesterday, 2 hours before a demo of the new WPF machine, I found out that the requirements for screen presentation of the data were all wrong and several screens would all have to be completely re-arranged. Both Windows Forms and WPF are old, and Microsoft is pointing developers towards its Universal Windows Platform (UWP) instead. SEE: Microsoft Build 2019: The biggest takeaways (free PDF) (TechRepublic) sorry, not even close, In other words, you can think of your form as a grid of pixels with the position of your controls determined at design time by its size and coordinates. WPF is not real windows (it’s a runtime on top of Windows) with no windows handles and WPF event bubbling is another bottleneck. d2) Lightswitch, amazing backend plus Silverlight as a front-end dead The results were pretty impressive. Until the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update, you could not use the .NET SQLClient to connect directly to a SQL Server database (you can now). It is arguably the most complicated add-in that has ever been produce for Word. of non vertical LOB in forms, delusional blowfication, typical b ig m outh blogger. Which way do I go? Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) has been released as part of the .NET framework 3.0 in 2006. The main issue is that the time you save on figuring out scaling is more than consumed by the time you spend on design.”. Which .NET framework for Windows: UWP, WPF or Windows Forms? Microsoft shovels more dirt on UWP apps, leaving Win32 apps as the future once again While the demise of UWP may be a win for users, killing off UWP … No DrawingVisuals, for instance. Designing using the technology mix mentioned is about growing companies into levels where you can very quickly face competition from others who simply hold a banking license. Of course, I’m working in a large enterprise with a network topology consisting of no less than 700 servers, with Win 7 and Win 10 clients across 6 states. It is also because, scaling issues aside, Windows Forms is reliable, well supported by both built-in and third-party controls, and easy to learn. There was no lag (trying to load the items) on both. Experience concerning the application of technologies is pretty dependent on the whether or not you want to grow a company, the domain, the processes and standards you will finally have to follow, … as well as the existing infrastructure found from where you get the data you want to visualize in an interactive fashion. Universal Windows Platform (UWP): This platform provides a common type system, APIs, and application model for all devices that run Windows 10. Others might also be interested in Dean Chalk’s recent post: Every year or so I pick up UWP and every year after an hour or two I put it back down. The resource compiler used to build the dialogs for MFC is also a separate step but that's still c++. WPF for .NET Framework; WPF for .NET Core 3; UWP; Xamarin Android and iOS are supported. you can see the memory usage. So we’ll return back to Winforms. If you want to code in .NET (which is a great choice for a Windows-only application, and with the possibility of migrating code to cross-platform via Xamarin’s compiler later), then you have three obvious choices: This is the framework for Windows desktop applications that was introduced at the same time as .NET itself, back in 2002. Third, UWP apps behave differently from standard desktop applications, sometimes not in a good way. If you are writing a database application, you can generate datasets by drag and drop from the Server Explorer in Visual Studio and bind them to controls. So, in my opinion, Listview is a great option to compare performance. “Microsoft And The UWP For Enterprise Delusion” However there are a few things against it. killed WPF’s reputation? Still, while it may seem surprising, even in 2018 I can think of reasons why you might use any of the above frameworks, even Windows Forms, for a business app targeting Windows. There are also other options for the desktop, such as Xamarin Forms if you still want to use .NET, or Electron for using web technologies for desktop applications. It was introduced with .NET Framework 3.0 in 2006, part of the Vista wave of technology. It was one year before Apple released its iPhone. if you want to talk about mundane functional that’s fine , but don’t kid yourself or others, there has never been any world class killer Xplat app, PERIOD. For native compilation, UWP uses .NET native, which have better performance than WPF .NET NGEN according to all internet. If you want more ���benchmarks��� like this, comment below and I may do in the future! Microsoft's UWP is going to be a major focus at the forthcoming Build conference in two weeks. WPF is a designer-centric framework. Hi Clyde, looks like Microsoft agrees with you re WPF , “This is the preferred technology for Windows-based desktop applications that require UI complexity, styles customization, and graphics-intensive scenarios for the desktop.”,, “Why would you not always use WPF rather than Windows Forms? Of course it has been revised many times since. Andriod :C++/Jave, Andriod Studio Perhaps something like Power Apps will render this discussion irrelevant before long. Then I had to do a program for a very similar machine and I pushed hard to change to WPF. Because I���ve seen a lot of people complain about UWP Listview (Xbox and Settings listview is HORRIBLE, microsoftpls). Windows Forms is a nice wrapper around the Windows API, and easy to use in that it uses essentially X Y layout. You���ll notice it better when you use touch. Collectively, these classes and interfaces are called the UWP XAML hosting API, and they enable you to host UWP controls in any UI element in your application that has a… Everything just lined itself up and the demo looked great. 4 months ago I finished programming a Human Machine Interface in WinForms. From the technical perspective you are totally right. As with Windows Forms, there is deep support for binding data to controls. UWP still offers Store delivery and isolation from other applications, better for security and stability. Put another way, UWP is … For example, quick app for your desktop: Windows forms. Math and floating point speed are strongly tied together. In this article series I explain what the options are – e.g. Core 3.0 also supports cross-development between UWP, WPF, and Windows Forms. He recently left Microsoft to go to Google where he is part of the group working on the mobile, web-based Flutter SDK/platform. In 2014, High DPI support was improved, with .NET 4.5.2, reflecting the fact that this ancient framework is still widely used. Overview of WPF & UWP Differences. b) WPF will replace Winforms and Winforms is dead. We’ve switched to WPF. sorry for the typos /offensive language, the Anti WPF nonsense bring out the rage, I’m far from exclusively WPF and have no problem with Java,C++ or Swift , but I always have to back down from what I can do with full framework WPF,WCF,MEF etc. I understand why they did some things but there are a mountain of things that should be easy that are difficult or are impossible. WPF and Windows Forms: These .NET-based platforms provide a common type system, APIs, and application model for managed applications. Windows Forms is still a very relevant decision for enterprise apps with requirements as you mention.